This blog has, so far, dealt only
with the three big west London clubs. But
the idea has always been to add other clubs to the mix. So let’s now look at Arsenal. Who knows – perhaps we can help Theo Walcott decide
exactly where to pitch his wage demands.
First, let’s see how Arsenal’s finances
stood at the end of last season – a significant one, in that it was the first
year in four that the accounts were not dominated by property development. Over the three previous years, 2008-11,
nearly a third of Arsenal’s revenue came from the sale of housing built on the
old Highbury stadium. That was almost as
much as they took in at the gate over the period. But last season, property sales dwindled to
hardly anything.
Free from that distortion, 2011-12 gave us the first clear read on
Arsenal’s finances for perhaps a decade, since construction of the Emirates
first became a factor. And on the face
of it, the outcome was unprepossessing: a £16m operating loss. But on this blog, we’re more interested in
cash flow than profit, and in cash terms things were somewhat better: an overall outflow, but only a negligible
one.
That’s respectable enough – but shouldn’t
it have been better? After all, the year
began with the sale of Fabregas and Nasri for a whopping aggregate of some £60m. But offsetting that was expenditure of nearly
£50m, chiefly on Arteta, Gervinho, Mertesacker and Oxlade-Chamberlain. It’s also probable that the Fabregas and
Nasri fees weren’t received in full in the year. Hence cash in from transfers was almost
exactly equalled by cash out.
Does that mean there’s a windfall to
come this season, when the balance comes in from Barcelona and Manchester
City? Yes: it looks as though they still
Arsenal £16m. Trouble is, Arsenal in
turn owe money to other clubs on previous player purchases: £23m, to be
precise. So the net outflow from
settling all those outstanding debts will be about £7m.
However, there may still be a property windfall to come. Some of the land adjacent to the stadium has recently
been sold to Barratt, for £26m. And the
club still owns undeveloped land on the Hornsey and Holloway Roads, which the
accounts suggest may be worth at least £10m.
In my next post, I’ll look at where that leaves Arsenal’s debt burden, often
the target of criticism from fans who’d like to see more money splashed out on
transfers.